MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.29.2.134

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cognitive psychotherapy · 2015

Depressive Rumination and Social Problem Solving in Japanese University Students.

Hasegawa Akira, Yoshida Takuya, Hattori Yosuke, Nishimura Haruki, Morimoto Hiroshi, Tanno Yoshihiko

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The relationship between depressive rumination and dimensions of social problem solving were investigated in a Japanese, nonclinical population. University students (N = 227) completed the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition, Ruminative Responses Scale, Means-Ends Problem-Solving (MEPS) test, and Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Short Version (SPSI-R:S). Results indicated that after controlling for depression, trait rumination, especially its brooding subcomponent, was positively correlated with negative problem orientation and avoidance style. Unexpectedly, trait rumination was weakly but positively associated with an effective problem-solving style, as assessed by the SPSI-R:S and MEPS. These findings suggest that one pathway through which rumination leads to depression in nonclinical populations could be through increasing negative problem orientation and avoidance problem-solving style. Results also suggested that reflection, compared to brooding, was positively associated with positive problem orientation and more strongly associated with rationale problem-solving style. These findings suggest that reflection leads to active problem solving.

Для цитирования: Hasegawa Akira, Yoshida Takuya, Hattori Yosuke, Nishimura Haruki, Morimoto Hiroshi, Tanno Yoshihiko. Depressive Rumination and Social Problem Solving in Japanese University Students.. Journal of cognitive psychotherapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.29.2.134.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.