BMC health services research · 2025
Research and community engagement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting: a mixed methods study with epidemic preparedness implications.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaawa-Mafigiri David, Muyomba Dickson, Kisakye Irene Sheila, Semakula Daniel, Sewankambo Nelson K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: When WHO declared the SARS-CoV- 2 respiratory virus pandemic in 2020, Uganda was unprepared to prevent and control its spread or manage the COVID- 19 and non-COVID patients. A community trial to assess the efficacy of an intensive community engagement and risk communication (CERC) was contemplated. However, a baseline assessment of the existing CERC status and the challenges of conducting community research in the early months of the pandemic was necessary.
METHODS: A community baseline qualitative research (in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and household conversations) was implemented in 15 parishes (6 and 9 in Kawempe and Nakawa divisions respectively) of Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 household heads (n = 10 in each division), 50 household conversations (n = 25 in each division), and focus group discussions (n = 10, five in each division) were conducted during the pandemic from October 2020 to February 2021.
RESULTS: Many potential challenges to research involving CERC were identified and were categorized into three main interrelated domains: (a) implementation challenges (b) social, cultural, and political context of the research, and (c) budgetary and funding constraints.
CONCLUSIONS: The three interrelated challenges identified in this study should be considered in future plans for epidemic and pandemic preparedness. The practical application of conventional concepts like CE, risk communication, qualitative research methods must be re-examined prior to epidemics and pandemics to improve their applicability and responsiveness during complex, dynamic epidemics and pandemics.
METHODS: A community baseline qualitative research (in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and household conversations) was implemented in 15 parishes (6 and 9 in Kawempe and Nakawa divisions respectively) of Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 household heads (n = 10 in each division), 50 household conversations (n = 25 in each division), and focus group discussions (n = 10, five in each division) were conducted during the pandemic from October 2020 to February 2021.
RESULTS: Many potential challenges to research involving CERC were identified and were categorized into three main interrelated domains: (a) implementation challenges (b) social, cultural, and political context of the research, and (c) budgetary and funding constraints.
CONCLUSIONS: The three interrelated challenges identified in this study should be considered in future plans for epidemic and pandemic preparedness. The practical application of conventional concepts like CE, risk communication, qualitative research methods must be re-examined prior to epidemics and pandemics to improve their applicability and responsiveness during complex, dynamic epidemics and pandemics.