Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2008
High revision rates after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marsk Richard, Jonas Eduard, Gartzios Helena, Stockeld Dag, Granström Lars, Freedman Jacob
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To evaluate, in a surgical department at a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, the long-term results after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), with special emphasis on revisional surgery. Few studies are available with long-term results after laparoscopic VBG. Some short-term studies have shown results similar to gastric banding.
METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic VBG between 1995 and 2005 were followed up regarding weight loss and the need for revisional surgery. Follow-up was from the date of surgery to the end of the observational period (December 2006).
RESULTS: In 486 patients, laparoscopic VBG was attempted. Of the 486 cases, 64 were converted to open surgery. Conversions were common in the first patients, with a conversion rate of 4% during the last 100 patients. The mean body mass index at surgery was 42.4 kg/m2. The median follow-up was 3 years (range 0-11). All patients lost weight. A total of 104 patients (21%) required revisional surgery 114 times during the follow-up period, with food intolerance/vomiting and insufficient weight loss the most common reasons. Of the 104 patients, 31 underwent repeat VBG, of whom 10 needed a secondary revisional procedure, and 49 required conversion to gastric bypass, of whom none have required additional revisional surgery.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic VBG is associated with high revisional rates. In the case of failed VBG, repeat VBG seems to be a poor option and conversion to gastric bypass yields better results. We have abandoned VBG as a surgical option in the treatment of obesity.
METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic VBG between 1995 and 2005 were followed up regarding weight loss and the need for revisional surgery. Follow-up was from the date of surgery to the end of the observational period (December 2006).
RESULTS: In 486 patients, laparoscopic VBG was attempted. Of the 486 cases, 64 were converted to open surgery. Conversions were common in the first patients, with a conversion rate of 4% during the last 100 patients. The mean body mass index at surgery was 42.4 kg/m2. The median follow-up was 3 years (range 0-11). All patients lost weight. A total of 104 patients (21%) required revisional surgery 114 times during the follow-up period, with food intolerance/vomiting and insufficient weight loss the most common reasons. Of the 104 patients, 31 underwent repeat VBG, of whom 10 needed a secondary revisional procedure, and 49 required conversion to gastric bypass, of whom none have required additional revisional surgery.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic VBG is associated with high revisional rates. In the case of failed VBG, repeat VBG seems to be a poor option and conversion to gastric bypass yields better results. We have abandoned VBG as a surgical option in the treatment of obesity.