MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/dme.15332

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2024

Towards the standardisation of adult person-reported outcome domains in diabetes research: A Consensus Statement development panel.

Barnard-Kelly Katharine, Marrero David, de Wit Maartje, Pouwer Frans, Khunti Kamlesh, Hermans Norbert, Pierce Jessica S, Laffel Lori, Holt Richard I G, Battelino Tadej, Naranjo Diana, Fosbury Jacqueline, Fisher Lawrence, Polonsky William, Weissberg-Benchell Jill, Hood Korey K, Schnell Oliver, Messer Laurel H, Danne Thomas, Nimri Revital, Skovlund Soren E, Mader Julia K, Sherr Jennifer L, Schatz Desmond, O'Neill Simon, Doble Emma, Town Marissa, Lange Karin, de Beaufort Carine, Gonder-Frederick Linda, Jaser Sarah S, Liberman Alon, Klonoff David, ElSayed Nuha A, Bannuru Raveendhara R, Parkin Christopher G, Snoek Frank

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Diabetes is unique among chronic diseases because clinical outcomes are intimately tied to how the person living with diabetes reacts to and implements treatment recommendations. It is further characterised by widespread social stigma, judgement and paternalism. This physical, social and psychological burden collectively influences self-management behaviours. It is widely recognised that the individual's perspective about the impact of trying to manage the disease and the burden that self-management confers must be addressed to achieve optimal health outcomes. Standardised, rigorous assessment of mental and behavioural health status, in interaction with physical health outcomes is crucial to aid understanding of person-reported outcomes (PROs). Whilst tempting to conceptualise PROs as an issue of perceived quality of life (QoL), in fact health-related QoL is multi-dimensional and covers indicators of physical or functional health status, psychological and social well-being. This complexity is illuminated by the large number of person reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been developed across multiple psychosocial domains. Often measures are used inappropriately or because they have been used in the scientific literature rather than based on methodological or outcome assessment rigour. Given the broad nature of psychosocial functioning/mental health, it is important to broadly define PROs that are evaluated in the context of therapeutic interventions, real-life and observational studies. This report summarises the central themes and lessons derived in the assessment and use of PROMs amongst adults with diabetes. Effective assessment of PROMs routinely in clinical research is crucial to understanding the true impact of any intervention. Selecting appropriate measures, relevant to the specific factors of PROs important in the research study will provide valuable data alongside physical health data.

Для цитирования: Barnard-Kelly Katharine, Marrero David, de Wit Maartje, Pouwer Frans, Khunti Kamlesh, Hermans Norbert, Pierce Jessica S, Laffel Lori, Holt Richard I G, Battelino Tadej, Naranjo Diana, Fosbury Jacqueline, Fisher Lawrence, Polonsky William, Weissberg-Benchell Jill, Hood Korey K, Schnell Oliver, Messer Laurel H, Danne Thomas, Nimri Revital, Skovlund Soren E, Mader Julia K, Sherr Jennifer L, Schatz Desmond, O'Neill Simon, Doble Emma, Town Marissa, Lange Karin, de Beaufort Carine, Gonder-Frederick Linda, Jaser Sarah S, Liberman Alon, Klonoff David, ElSayed Nuha A, Bannuru Raveendhara R, Parkin Christopher G, Snoek Frank. Towards the standardisation of adult person-reported outcome domains in diabetes research: A Consensus Statement development panel.. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/dme.15332.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.