MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17483107.2011.644622

Медицинская библиотека · Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2011

Talking Mats in a discussion group for people with Huntington's disease.

Hallberg Lisa, Mellgren Elin, Hartelius Lena, Ferm Ulrika

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the function of Talking Mats (TM) in a discussion group for people with Huntington's disease (HD).

METHOD: Four persons with HD and their group leader participated. The group was videotaped during four discussions, two with and two without TM. A mixed method quantitative and qualitative study was implemented by evaluating the conversations using the protocol Effectiveness Framework of Functional Communication by analyzing the number of follow-up questions and by post discussion interviews.

RESULTS

The results showed improved effectiveness of communication for all participants and an increased number of follow-up questions, both from the group leader and from some of the participants. All participants and the leader were positive regarding the use of TM but there were also drawbacks.

CONCLUSIONS

TM could be useful in discussion groups for people with HD. An increased number of follow-up questions when TM is used may lead to a deeper understanding within the group. This study is the first of its kind and more research in the area is needed. [Box: see text].

Для цитирования: Hallberg Lisa, Mellgren Elin, Hartelius Lena, Ferm Ulrika. Talking Mats in a discussion group for people with Huntington's disease.. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2011.644622.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.