Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2015
Diabetes quality of care at a university community in Beirut.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lakkis Najla A, Mahmassani Dina M, Hamadeh Ghassan N
Аннотация
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of diabetes mellitus (DM) care provided by a group of family doctors in Beirut.
METHODS: An observational study, conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center-Family Medicine Clinics (AUBMC-FMC), examined the electronic health records (EHRs) of the beneficiaries of the Health Insurance Plan at the American University of Beirut (AUB-HIP) who were older than 20 years (n = 9469) in 2009. The eligible population included patients with DM (n = 701). Several provider/patient-directed interventions were introduced in the late 2000s, including a comprehensive EHRs system with point-of-care computer reminders, a provider financial incentive based on an annual performance appraisal ranked against that of the US Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, as well as periodic up-to-date training.
RESULTS: Optimal control for HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure were found in 58.6%, 51.0%, 22.4%, 53.3% and 60.2% of the population, respectively. 64.1% and 70.0% received screening for diabetic nephropathy and a dilated eye examination, respectively. When benchmarked against the HEDIS Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, the AUB-HIP's quality of care was 13% higher than the average of all plans in the United States. Screening for nephropathy, however, did not reach the above benchmark.
CONCLUSIONS: Benchmarking served as an important tool in evaluating the current DM care offered and in detecting gaps, yet interventions are recommended for further improvement.
METHODS: An observational study, conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center-Family Medicine Clinics (AUBMC-FMC), examined the electronic health records (EHRs) of the beneficiaries of the Health Insurance Plan at the American University of Beirut (AUB-HIP) who were older than 20 years (n = 9469) in 2009. The eligible population included patients with DM (n = 701). Several provider/patient-directed interventions were introduced in the late 2000s, including a comprehensive EHRs system with point-of-care computer reminders, a provider financial incentive based on an annual performance appraisal ranked against that of the US Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, as well as periodic up-to-date training.
RESULTS: Optimal control for HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure were found in 58.6%, 51.0%, 22.4%, 53.3% and 60.2% of the population, respectively. 64.1% and 70.0% received screening for diabetic nephropathy and a dilated eye examination, respectively. When benchmarked against the HEDIS Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, the AUB-HIP's quality of care was 13% higher than the average of all plans in the United States. Screening for nephropathy, however, did not reach the above benchmark.
CONCLUSIONS: Benchmarking served as an important tool in evaluating the current DM care offered and in detecting gaps, yet interventions are recommended for further improvement.