European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
Impact of combined surgery on reoperation rates in odontogenic sinusitis: a retrospective comparative study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Almanzo Santiago, Astray-Gómez Saúl, Tortajada-Torralba Inés, Cabrera-Guijo Javier, Fito-Martorell Lucas, Muñoz-Fernández Noelia, Armengot-Carceller Miguel, García-Piñero Alfonso
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is a frequent but underdiagnosed condition requiring multidisciplinary management. This study aims to compare outcomes between single-stage combined surgical treatment by otolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery teams versus non-combined approaches, and to evaluate whether the type of prior treatment influences the need for reintervention or secondary procedures.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including 96 patients with ODS surgically treated between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were categorized according to etiology and surgical strategy (combined vs. non-combined). Additionally, we analyzed whether the type of previous treatment (none, otolaryngology alone, maxillofacial surgery, dentist, or combined) was associated with the need for reoperation or second-stage maxillofacial surgery.
RESULTS: Combined surgery significantly reduced reoperation rates (p = 0.003), particularly in periodontic/endodontic infection cases (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in the need for second-stage maxillofacial surgery between groups. Reoperation was more frequent among patients initially treated by otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgeons, while those managed first by dentists had significantly lower reoperation rates (p < 0.001). The type of previous treatment was not significantly associated with second-stage maxillofacial surgery. Etiology and patient age did not influence surgical outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Single-stage combined surgery reduces the need for reoperation in ODS. When a staged approach is selected, prioritizing initial dental or maxillofacial management before otolaryngologic intervention appears to yield better outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including 96 patients with ODS surgically treated between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were categorized according to etiology and surgical strategy (combined vs. non-combined). Additionally, we analyzed whether the type of previous treatment (none, otolaryngology alone, maxillofacial surgery, dentist, or combined) was associated with the need for reoperation or second-stage maxillofacial surgery.
RESULTS: Combined surgery significantly reduced reoperation rates (p = 0.003), particularly in periodontic/endodontic infection cases (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in the need for second-stage maxillofacial surgery between groups. Reoperation was more frequent among patients initially treated by otolaryngology or maxillofacial surgeons, while those managed first by dentists had significantly lower reoperation rates (p < 0.001). The type of previous treatment was not significantly associated with second-stage maxillofacial surgery. Etiology and patient age did not influence surgical outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Single-stage combined surgery reduces the need for reoperation in ODS. When a staged approach is selected, prioritizing initial dental or maxillofacial management before otolaryngologic intervention appears to yield better outcomes.