Journal des maladies vasculaires · 2015
[Systematic screening of masked hypertension in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a pilot study].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Claisse G, Maldonado P, Kpogbemabou N, Boudghène-Stambouli F, Delsart P, Devos P, Mounier-Vehier C
Аннотация
AIM: Masked hypertension (MH) is defined by a normal office blood pressure (BP) and a high ambulatory BP. MH is characterized by high prevalence and poor cardiovascular prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of routine MH screening, using 24-h blood pressure monitoring (BPM), among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, 54 patients with PAD were included in the Hypertension and Vascular Medicine Unit of the Lille Hospital. They had normal office BP (< 140/90mmHg). A 24 h-BPM device was set on each patient. MH diagnosis was established if the BP average over 24 hours was ≥ 130/80 mmHg and/or the daytime average ≥ 135/85 mmHg and/or the nighttime average ≥ 120/70 mmHg.
RESULTS: MH prevalence was about 42.6% (23 patients). It was significantly more frequent in diabetic patients (odds ratio: 3.8 [1.1-12.8]), in patients with known hypertension (odds ratio: 5 [1.5-16.9]) or with high normal office BP (<140/90 mmHg but ≥ 130/85 mmHg) (odds ratio: 5.6 [1.7-18.2]). By multivariate analysis, only known hypertension and high normal office BP were associated with masked hypertension.
CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of MH in patients with PAD shows us the importance of a careful screening of MH in this population, especially in diabetic patients, in patients with known hypertension or with a high normal office BP.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, 54 patients with PAD were included in the Hypertension and Vascular Medicine Unit of the Lille Hospital. They had normal office BP (< 140/90mmHg). A 24 h-BPM device was set on each patient. MH diagnosis was established if the BP average over 24 hours was ≥ 130/80 mmHg and/or the daytime average ≥ 135/85 mmHg and/or the nighttime average ≥ 120/70 mmHg.
RESULTS: MH prevalence was about 42.6% (23 patients). It was significantly more frequent in diabetic patients (odds ratio: 3.8 [1.1-12.8]), in patients with known hypertension (odds ratio: 5 [1.5-16.9]) or with high normal office BP (<140/90 mmHg but ≥ 130/85 mmHg) (odds ratio: 5.6 [1.7-18.2]). By multivariate analysis, only known hypertension and high normal office BP were associated with masked hypertension.
CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of MH in patients with PAD shows us the importance of a careful screening of MH in this population, especially in diabetic patients, in patients with known hypertension or with a high normal office BP.