Journal of clinical periodontology · 2015
Six-month outcomes in dental patients identified with hyperglycaemia: a randomized clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lalla Evanthia, Cheng Bin, Kunzel Carol, Burkett Sandra, Ferraro Andrew, Lamster Ira B
Аннотация
AIM: To assess an approach to improving behavioural and glycaemic outcomes in dental patients who present with diabetes risk factors and previously unrecognized hyperglycaemia.
METHODS: We randomized 101 individuals identified with potential diabetes or pre-diabetes into two interventions. In the basic/control intervention, participants were informed about their diabetes risk factors and blood test result, and advised to see a physician. In the enhanced/test intervention, patients received a detailed explanation of findings and their implications, a written report for the physician, and were contacted at 2 and 4 months to inquire whether medical follow-up had occurred. At a 6-month re-evaluation, outcome measures included visit to physician, positive lifestyle changes and reduction in HbA1c.
RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects returned for the 6-month visit. The two intervention groups did not significantly differ in any of the outcome variables. Eighty-four percent of subjects reported having visited a physician post-randomization, and 49% reported at least one positive lifestyle change as a result of our intervention. In subjects identified with potential diabetes (baseline HbA1c ≥ 6.5%), HbA1c was reduced 1.46 ± 0.28% compared to baseline (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Diabetes risk assessment and education by dental professionals of affected individuals unaware of their status may contribute to improved patient outcomes.
METHODS: We randomized 101 individuals identified with potential diabetes or pre-diabetes into two interventions. In the basic/control intervention, participants were informed about their diabetes risk factors and blood test result, and advised to see a physician. In the enhanced/test intervention, patients received a detailed explanation of findings and their implications, a written report for the physician, and were contacted at 2 and 4 months to inquire whether medical follow-up had occurred. At a 6-month re-evaluation, outcome measures included visit to physician, positive lifestyle changes and reduction in HbA1c.
RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects returned for the 6-month visit. The two intervention groups did not significantly differ in any of the outcome variables. Eighty-four percent of subjects reported having visited a physician post-randomization, and 49% reported at least one positive lifestyle change as a result of our intervention. In subjects identified with potential diabetes (baseline HbA1c ≥ 6.5%), HbA1c was reduced 1.46 ± 0.28% compared to baseline (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Diabetes risk assessment and education by dental professionals of affected individuals unaware of their status may contribute to improved patient outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedBlood GlucoseBody WeightConsumer Health InformationDental CareExerciseFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHealth BehaviorHumansHyperglycemiaLife StyleMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicPeriodontal IndexPeriodontal PocketPrediabetic StateReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTooth LossTreatment Outcome