Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2009
Systematic review of evidence for the use of intradialytic parenteral nutrition in malnourished hemodialysis patients.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sigrist Mhairi K, Levin Adeera, Tejani Aaron M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is widely used to treat malnourished hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the benefits of this treatment are unknown. Moderate protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) is thought to affect 15% to 43% of maintenance HD patients, and is independently associated with mortality in this population. This study systematically reviews the current literature, to assess whether IDPN improves survival, quality of life, or nutritional status in those receiving maintenance HD.
METHODS: Two investigators undertook a formal systematic review of the literature, using the following key search words: intradialytic parenteral nutrition or intradialytic total parenteral nutrition plus any combination of renal dialysis or kidney-failure or chronic kidney disease and parenteral nutrition or intravenous nutrition or intravenous feeding.
RESULTS: The search identified three suitable randomized, controlled trials, only one of which investigated hard clinical endpoints. There were insufficient data to undertake a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from clinical studies is insufficient to demonstrate either a net benefit or a net harm associated with the providing IDPN to malnourished HD patients. We recommend that any patient in whom IDPN was deemed necessary be entered into a clinical trial or registry, to record hard clinical outcomes associated with the use of this treatment.
METHODS: Two investigators undertook a formal systematic review of the literature, using the following key search words: intradialytic parenteral nutrition or intradialytic total parenteral nutrition plus any combination of renal dialysis or kidney-failure or chronic kidney disease and parenteral nutrition or intravenous nutrition or intravenous feeding.
RESULTS: The search identified three suitable randomized, controlled trials, only one of which investigated hard clinical endpoints. There were insufficient data to undertake a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from clinical studies is insufficient to demonstrate either a net benefit or a net harm associated with the providing IDPN to malnourished HD patients. We recommend that any patient in whom IDPN was deemed necessary be entered into a clinical trial or registry, to record hard clinical outcomes associated with the use of this treatment.