MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1994.tb01732.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 1994

Intestinal passage of the PEG end-piece: is it safe?

Coventry B J, Karatassas A, Gower L, Wilson P

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Two rare but life-threatening complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are reported: small bowel perforation and obstruction. Both resulted from impaction of the PEG end-piece after separation at skin level. Review of the literature revealed very few complications from intestinal passage of PEG end-pieces. The free intragastric PEG end-piece routinely passes through the gastrointestinal tract in most cases. One of these two cases was drawn from a series of 100 patients with intentional intestinal passage of PEG end-pieces to give a severe complication rate of 1%. A case can be made for routine endoscopic per-oral removal of PEG end-pieces in the elective setting, but this is more costly and not without hazard. Previous laparotomy and/or known adhesions is a relative indication for endoscopic retrieval of the PEG end-piece. Oesophageal disease or intolerance of endoscopy is a relative indication for intestinal passage. Close clinical follow up is recommended to ensure that the PEG end-piece has passed per-rectum. If the PEG end-piece has not passed and is shown in the small bowel on plain X-ray at approximately 3 weeks after separation then lodgement has probably occurred and early operative intervention is warranted.

Для цитирования: Coventry B J, Karatassas A, Gower L, Wilson P. Intestinal passage of the PEG end-piece: is it safe?. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 1994. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1994.tb01732.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.