MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.831363

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022

Case Report: Is Surgical Treatment Beneficial for Intracranial Basal Ganglia Cunninghamellamycosis Following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?

Xi Bixin, Liu Aiguo, Zhao Xin, Zhang Yicheng, Wang Na

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cunninghamellamycosis is an unusual but often highly fatal mucormycosis caused by Cunninghamella bertholletiae, which belongs to the basal lineage order Mucorales. It is especially fatal when the central nervous system is involved. So far, there are few reported cases of surgical treatment for intracranial mucormycosis in children after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The surgical management of deep-seated basal ganglia fungal lesions remains controversial, and its clinical benefits are not yet well established. Herein, we present a rare case of disseminated mucormycosis caused by C. bertholletiae involving the lung and intracranial basal ganglia after homologous leucocytic antigen-matched sibling donor HSCT. The patient was successfully treated for intracranial cunninghamellamycosis with neuroendoscopic surgery and systemic wide-spectrum antifungal treatment and achieved pulmonary recovery without recurrent C. bertholletiae infection or neurologic sequelae. Over the follow-up period of 13 months, there were no adverse events associated with the intracranial surgical debridement, and the patient remained in good health.

Для цитирования: Xi Bixin, Liu Aiguo, Zhao Xin, Zhang Yicheng, Wang Na. Case Report: Is Surgical Treatment Beneficial for Intracranial Basal Ganglia Cunninghamellamycosis Following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.831363.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.