MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] · 2005

[The use of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws for the treatment of injury of lower cervical spine].

Zhao Xue-Ling, Zhao Hong-Bin, Wang Bin, Li Lin-Zhi, Zhu Xiao-Song, Zhang Chun-Qiang

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the effect of the use of the cervical lateral mass plates screws and T(1) pedicle screws for the treatment of C(6) to C(7) injury through posterior approach.

METHODS

There were 8 patients in the study group; Each of them had been injured with low cervical spine C(6) or C(7). There were 6 cases with C(6)-C(7) injury and 2 cases with C(7) injury. According to ASIA classification, 3 cases were in grade C and 5 cases in D. The lateral mass screws were placed on the lateral masses using Margel technique. Lamina or facet bone allografting were used to achieve a long-term stability.

RESULTS

All 8 patients were followed up from 5 to 37 months (mean 15 months). No operative death occurred. There were no cord or vertebral artery injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nerve roots injury, screw malposition or back out, loose of alignment or implant failure. Clinical symptom and ASIA classification were improved in all patients. Postoperative MRI scanning confirmed satisfactory screw placement in all cases.

CONCLUSION

This technique is safe and benefit to patients with low cervical spine C(6) or C(7) injury.

Для цитирования: Zhao Xue-Ling, Zhao Hong-Bin, Wang Bin, Li Lin-Zhi, Zhu Xiao-Song, Zhang Chun-Qiang. [The use of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws for the treatment of injury of lower cervical spine].. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.