The Laryngoscope · 2002
Informed consent in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wolf Jeffrey S, Malekzadeh Sonya, Berry Julie A, O'Malley Bert W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is one of the more common procedures performed by otolaryngologists. Before performing FESS, surgeons are obligated to discuss the procedure and its risks through the process of informed patient consent. The study identifies current practices in informed consent for FESS and formulates guidelines for informed consent for FESS.
STUDY DESIGN: Survey.
METHODS: Surveys were sent to 1000 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery members in the United States. Surveys inquired about current informed consent practices related to FESS.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six surveys were returned. Nearly 60% of respondents thought that 1% incidence of a complication warrants a discussion with patients. The percentage of respondents who discuss specific risks were as follows: bleeding, 96.7%; infection, 84.8%; cerebrospinal fluid leak, 99.1%; orbital injury, 96.7%; smell changes, 40.2%; cerebrovascular accident, 17.9%; myocardial infarction, 81%; and death, 28.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there is variability in specific informed consent practices for FESS among otolaryngologists. It also suggests that the incidence or severity of a complication does not necessarily correlate with whether or not it is mentioned during the informed consent process. The authors think that practicing otolaryngologists may be able to use this information to improve their consent practices.
STUDY DESIGN: Survey.
METHODS: Surveys were sent to 1000 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery members in the United States. Surveys inquired about current informed consent practices related to FESS.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six surveys were returned. Nearly 60% of respondents thought that 1% incidence of a complication warrants a discussion with patients. The percentage of respondents who discuss specific risks were as follows: bleeding, 96.7%; infection, 84.8%; cerebrospinal fluid leak, 99.1%; orbital injury, 96.7%; smell changes, 40.2%; cerebrovascular accident, 17.9%; myocardial infarction, 81%; and death, 28.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there is variability in specific informed consent practices for FESS among otolaryngologists. It also suggests that the incidence or severity of a complication does not necessarily correlate with whether or not it is mentioned during the informed consent process. The authors think that practicing otolaryngologists may be able to use this information to improve their consent practices.