MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ijgo.13405

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020

Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study.

Maged Ahmed M, Ragab Mohamed A, Shohayeb Amal, Saber Waleed, Ekladious Sherif, Hussein Eman A, El-Mazny Akmal, Hany Ayman

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can improve the number of retrieved oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial included poor ovarian responders indicated for ICSI using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. They were divided equally into two groups: group I received 10 000 units of hCG plus 0.2 mg of triptorelin while group II received 10 000 units of hCG only for triggering of ovulation. The primary outcome parameter was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included metaphase II oocytes number, cancellation rate, number of obtained embryos, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty women were included in the study, with 80 women in each treatment group. Dual triggering was associated with higher number of retrieved oocytes (5.3 ± 1.9 vs 4.5 ± 2.4, P=0.014), metaphase II oocytes (3.8 ± 1.4 vs 3.1 ± 1.7, P=0.004), total and grade 1 embryos (2.7 ± 1.1 and 2.3 ± 1.0 vs 1.9 ± 1.2 and 1.1 ± 0.2, P=0.001 and 0.021 respectively), and transferred embryos (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 1.6 ± 0.9, P=0.043, and lower cancellation rate (7.5% vs 20%, P=0.037) compared with single triggering. There were significantly higher chemical (25% vs 11.3%, P=0.039) and clinical (22.5% vs 8.8%, P=0.028) pregnancy rates in women with dual triggering compared with those with single triggering.

CONCLUSION

Dual triggering is associated with better IVF outcome in poor responders compared with single trigger. Clinical trial registration NCT04008966.

Для цитирования: Maged Ahmed M, Ragab Mohamed A, Shohayeb Amal, Saber Waleed, Ekladious Sherif, Hussein Eman A, El-Mazny Akmal, Hany Ayman. Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study.. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13405.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.