MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577544

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2019

Laser and laser compound therapy for melasma: a meta-analysis.

Zhang Yanan, Zheng Xiaoyan, Chen Zhiwei, Lu Liming

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Treatment of melasma is challenging because its pathogenesis is unclear and it is prone to recurrence. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser and laser compound therapy for melasma.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases for all relevant studies published from inception to July 2018. All randomized controlled trials of melasma describing treatment with lasers or laser compound therapy were included.

Results

A total of 346 patients were enrolled in nine RCT studies. Laser therapy and laser compound therapy had better PGA (MD: 1.96 (95% CI: 0.17, 3.75); I2 = 0%) and mMASI scores (MD: -1.57 (95% CI: -3.08, -0.05); I2 = 19%) than drug and laser therapy, respectively. Four studies were assessed to be of low risk of bias. Subgroup analysis was consistent with the results of the meta-analysis, reflecting the reliability of our results.Linking evidence to action: The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence that laser and laser compound therapy can improve the area and severity of melasma. Further high-quality clinical studies should be carried out in the future to confirm this conclusion. Abbreviations: MASI: Melasma Area and Severity Index; mMASI: modified Melasma Area and Severity Index; PGA: patient global assessment; MI: melasma index.

Для цитирования: Zhang Yanan, Zheng Xiaoyan, Chen Zhiwei, Lu Liming. Laser and laser compound therapy for melasma: a meta-analysis.. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1577544.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.