Journal of critical care · 2024
Serial monitoring of pancreatic stone protein for the detection of sepsis in intensive care unit patients with complicated abdominal surgery: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Filippidis Paraskevas, Hovius Leana, Tissot Frederic, Orasch Christina, Flückiger Ursula, Siegemund Martin, Pagani Jean-Luc, Eggimann Philippe, Marchetti Oscar, Lamoth Frederic, Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS)
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) monitoring for the detection of sepsis, prediction of outcome and distinction between bacterial and fungal infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with complicated abdominal surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cohort study, patients with complicated abdominal surgery had serial PSP measurements during their ICU stay. Infectious episodes were classified as bacterial, fungal or mixed. PSPmax (maximal PSP value within 48 h of the diagnosis of infection) and ΔPSP (difference between PSPmax and the preceding PSP value) were used for analyses.
RESULTS: PSPmax was obtained for 118 infectious episodes (68 patients). ΔPSP was available for 73 episodes (48 patients). Both PSPmax and ΔPSP were significantly higher in patients with sepsis and in patients with a fatal outcome. A PSPmax ≥124 ng/ml and a ΔPSP ≥34 ng/ml could detect sepsis with a sensitivity/specificity of 84%/54% and 69%/76%, respectively. There was no significant difference of PSPmax or ΔPSP between patients with bacterial/mixed versus fungal infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Serial PSP monitoring may be an additional tool for the early detection of sepsis in patients with complicated abdominal surgery who are at high risk of severe infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cohort study, patients with complicated abdominal surgery had serial PSP measurements during their ICU stay. Infectious episodes were classified as bacterial, fungal or mixed. PSPmax (maximal PSP value within 48 h of the diagnosis of infection) and ΔPSP (difference between PSPmax and the preceding PSP value) were used for analyses.
RESULTS: PSPmax was obtained for 118 infectious episodes (68 patients). ΔPSP was available for 73 episodes (48 patients). Both PSPmax and ΔPSP were significantly higher in patients with sepsis and in patients with a fatal outcome. A PSPmax ≥124 ng/ml and a ΔPSP ≥34 ng/ml could detect sepsis with a sensitivity/specificity of 84%/54% and 69%/76%, respectively. There was no significant difference of PSPmax or ΔPSP between patients with bacterial/mixed versus fungal infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Serial PSP monitoring may be an additional tool for the early detection of sepsis in patients with complicated abdominal surgery who are at high risk of severe infections.