MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/erv.1098

Медицинская библиотека · European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2011

Decision-making impairments in women with binge eating disorder in comparison with obese and normal weight women.

Danner Unna N, Ouwehand Carolijn, van Haastert Noor L, Hornsveld Hellen, de Ridder Denise T D

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to examine decision making in female patients with binge eating disorder (BED) in comparison with obese and normal weight women.

METHOD: In the study, 20 patients with BED, 21 obese women without BED and 34 healthy women participated. Decision making was assessed using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Several questionnaires were administered measuring binge eating severity, sensitivity for punishment and reward, and self-control.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that the BED and obese group performed poorly on the IGT. Participants who have BED and are obese did not improve their choice behaviour over time, whereas participants with normal weight showed a learning effect. An association between IGT performance and binge eating severity was found.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with BED display decision-making deficits on the IGT comparable with other forms of disordered eating. Future research should focus on unravelling the processes underlying the deficits.

Для цитирования: Danner Unna N, Ouwehand Carolijn, van Haastert Noor L, Hornsveld Hellen, de Ridder Denise T D. Decision-making impairments in women with binge eating disorder in comparison with obese and normal weight women.. European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/erv.1098.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.