MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0033291710001832

Медицинская библиотека · Psychological medicine · 2010

Decision making in euthymic bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.

Martino D J, Strejilevich S A, Torralva T, Manes F

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to compare a large population of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) types I and II strictly defined as euthymic with healthy controls on measures of decision making. An additional aim was to compare performance on a decision-making task between patients with and without a history of suicide attempt.

METHOD: Eighty-five euthymic patients with BD-I or BD-II and 34 healthy controls were included. All subjects completed tests to assess verbal memory, attention and executive functions, and a decision-making paradigm (the Iowa Gambling Task, IGT).

RESULTS

Both groups of patients had worse performance than healthy controls on measures of verbal memory, attention and executive function. No significant differences were found between BD-I, BD-II and healthy controls on measures of decision making. By contrast, patients with a history of suicide attempt had lower performance in the IGT than patients without a history of suicide attempt.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with euthymic BD-I and BD-II had intact decision-making abilities, suggesting that this does not represent a reliable trait marker of the disorder. In addition, our results provide further evidence of an association between impairments in decision making and vulnerability to suicidal behavior.

Для цитирования: Martino D J, Strejilevich S A, Torralva T, Manes F. Decision making in euthymic bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.. Psychological medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291710001832.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.