MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jocd.15096

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022

2940-nm erbium:YAG laser versus 980-nm diode laser in the treatment of multiple seborrheic keratoses: A prospective comparative randomized study.

Osman Mai Abdelraouf

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Seborrheic keratoses (SKs) are the most common benign epithelial tumors encountered in clinical practice. Complications associated with traditional treatments of SKs urge the scientists to seek alternative treatment modalities. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 2940-nm erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser versus 980-nm diode laser both clinically and dermoscopically for the treatment of seborrheic keratosis.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with multiple SKs were randomized to receive two sessions of either Er:YAG laser (n = 15) or diode laser (n = 15) and were followed up for 2 weeks after each session, and at 3 and 6 months after the second session.

RESULTS

Both lasers exhibited significant clearance of SKs with no significant difference in clinical and dermoscopic improvement between the two systems. However, Er:YAG laser showed shorter total downtime but more serious erythema, while scarring and hyperpigmentation were observed in diode laser group. No recurrence was detected in both groups at 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Er:YAG and diode lasers both are effective, non-invasive and well-tolerated techniques in treatment of SKs.

Для цитирования: Osman Mai Abdelraouf. 2940-nm erbium:YAG laser versus 980-nm diode laser in the treatment of multiple seborrheic keratoses: A prospective comparative randomized study.. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15096.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.