External validation of an AI-Based fracture detection tool for hip and pelvic radiographs in a multicenter retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Artificial intelligence tools show promise in fracture detection but may be impaired by hidden stratification. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available AI tool for detecting hip and pelvic fractures, with emphasis on clinically relevant subgroups and AO/OTA fracture classifications.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter diagnostic test accuracy study included consecutive trauma patients who underwent hip or pelvic radiography. The reference standard was based on post-conference clinical radiology reports, incorporating MRI, CT, and radiography in hierarchical order. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA system. Studied subgroups included surgical metal, degenerative disease, old fractures, radiographically occult fractures and fracture classification. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among 642 patients (median age 82 years), 262 (42%) had fractures. Overall sensitivity was 87% [83-91%] and specificity 86% [82-89%]. Specificity was reduced in cases with old fractures (29% [13-51%]). Sensitivity was high for femoral neck (95% [88-98%]) and trochanteric fractures (92% [82-97%]) and moderate for pelvic (82% [70-91%]) and acetabular fractures (58% [28-85%]). Within each segment the classifications with most missed fractures were unilateral anterior pelvic arch (61A2.2), subcapital femur neck (31B1), and simple trochanteric fractures (31A1).

CONCLUSION

In summary, while specificity was notably reduced in cases with old fractures and sensitivity was moderate for pelvic and acetabular fractures, the AI tool demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for hip-region trauma radiographs, with most missed cases occurring among the subtle AO/OTA fracture groups.