MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40123-026-01331-2

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026

Advances and Challenges in Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Romano Mario R, Savastano Alfonso, Keegan David, Toro Mario Damiano, Vidal-Aroca Faustino, Di Simplicio Sandro, Stanzel Boris, Fasolino Giuseppe, Cabrera Francisco, Rizzo Stanislao

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Sulcus implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) is an essential strategy when capsular support is inadequate or postoperative refractive correction is required. Evidence on safety, design considerations, and clinical outcomes is extensive but heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise current evidence on indications, visual outcomes, and complication profiles of sulcus-implanted IOLs, and to highlight design-dependent factors influencing predictability and safety.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted using PubMed and manual reference screening. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of sulcus-positioned IOLs-including three-piece lenses, supplementary/add-on lenses, and sulcus-placed primary IOLs-were included. Numerical values are presented as reported, without standardised pooling or comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Across indications such as aphakia, zonular weakness, IOL dislocation, capsular rupture, and refractive enhancement, postoperative visual acuity was generally stable, with mean improvements commonly ranging from 0.10 to 0.30 logMAR in appropriately selected cases. Complications varied substantially by IOL design. Three-piece lenses showed low rates of cystoid macular oedema (1-8%), pigment dispersion (0-12%), and intraocular pressure elevation (1-9%). In contrast, single-piece acrylic lenses demonstrated consistently higher risk of uveal chafing, pigment dispersion, intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, and uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema (UGH) syndrome. Purpose-designed sulcus and add-on lenses demonstrated good centration, low decentration or tilt, and predictable reversibility. Endothelial safety was generally comparable to standard cataract surgery when sulcus-appropriate designs were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulcus implantation is a versatile and reliable option when the capsular bag is compromised or supplementary correction is required. Outcomes and safety are strongly design-dependent, with three-piece and sulcus-specific add-on lenses showing the most favourable profiles. Further prospective studies are needed to refine long-term risk assessment and design-based recommendations.

Для цитирования: Romano Mario R, Savastano Alfonso, Keegan David, Toro Mario Damiano, Vidal-Aroca Faustino, Di Simplicio Sandro, Stanzel Boris, Fasolino Giuseppe, Cabrera Francisco, Rizzo Stanislao. Advances and Challenges in Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.. Ophthalmology and therapy. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-026-01331-2.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.