Comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and bosentan effect in mildly hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has only limited impact on blood pressure (BP). Alternative strategies for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)-associated hypertension are therefore needed. Endothelin-1 has been demonstrated a key player in the deleterious cardiovascular consequences of OSA. In OSA, CPAP treatment has never been compared with endothelin receptor antagonist medications. Thus, we assessed the respective efficacy of CPAP and bosentan in reducing 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with OSA never treated by either therapy.

METHODS

In a crossover pilot study, 16 mildly hypertensive patients (office systolic BP (SBP)/DBP: 142 ± 7/85 ± 8 mm Hg) with severe OSA (55 ± 8 years; body mass index, 29.6 ± 4.2 kg/m(2) ; apnoea-hypopnoea index, 40.8 ± 20.2/h) were randomized to either CPAP (n = 7) or bosentan (125 mg/day, n = 9) first for 4 weeks. After 2-weeks of washout, the second 4-week period consisted of the alternative treatment (in crossover). The primary outcome was the 24-h mean DBP change after treatment.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analysis, the mean difference in 24-h DBP measurements between treatments was -3.1 (-6.9/0.7) mm Hg (median, 25th/75th percentiles) (P = 0.101) with bosentan having a greater effect.

CONCLUSION

In this RCT, in mildly hypertensive patients with OSA, bosentan did not modify 24-h DBP but only reduced office BP suggesting that Endothelin-1 blockade does not play a major role in treatment of OSA-related hypertension.