Role of nasal positive end expiratory pressure valve as an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

As compliance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is often suboptimal, a less cumbersome treatment is desirable. We explored the clinical usefulness of nasal positive end expiratory pressure (nPEEP) valves.

METHODS

Symptomatic OSA patients (apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) >5/h by polysomnography (PSG) or >10/h by type III devices), who declined CPAP, were recruited. A nPEEP valve was attached to each nostril before bed. After successful acclimatization for 1 week, treatment was continued for 4 weeks. The nPEEP valves provided expiratory resistance to build up PEEP. PSG was performed at week 4.

RESULTS

Among 196 subjects, 46 (23%) failed acclimatization and 14 (7%) withdrew. Among the 120 patients with a valid PSG, 72 (60%) and 75 (63%) had >50% reduction in mean (standard deviation) overall AHI 26 (16)/h to 18 (18)/h and mean supine AHI 31 (19)/h to 11(16)/h, respectively, P < 0.001. Compared with responders, patients with <50% reduction in AHI had a higher mean overall AHI (30/h vs 23/h, P = 0.03), higher mean supine AHI (35/h vs 26/h, P = 0.04), more severe mean oxygen desaturation nadir (76.7% vs 82.7%, P < 0.01) and longer mean period of desaturation <90% SaO2 (7.7 vs 2.4, P = 0.02). Breathing discomfort and dry mouth were the most common side effects. Compared with a dental device, there was a larger mean reduction in supine AHI using nPEEP (29 (14)/h vs 16 (17)/h).

CONCLUSION

nPEEP valves were useful in selected patients with mild or positional-related OSA.