MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/rycan.240318

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025

Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study.

Nguyen Alex A, Cohen Eric A, Haji Maghsoudi Omid, Acciavatti Raymond J, Pantalone Lauren, Mankowski Walter C, Scott Christopher G, Winham Stacey, Vachon Celine M, Maidment Andrew D, Conant Emily F, McCarthy Anne Marie, Kontos Despina

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Purpose To compare the performance of volumetric radiomic parenchymal pattern analysis from three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images with that of two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) and 2D sections from DBT in assessing breast cancer risk relative to breast density measurements. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective matched case-control study among individuals who underwent concurrent DM and DBT screening from March 2011 through December 2014. The Cancer Phenomics Toolkit was used to calculate radiomic features from craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in all study patients, matched on race and age, for various experimental settings, including image resolution and window size. For each image type, conditional logistic regression evaluated the association of radiomic features, along with age, body mass index (BMI), and area percent density (PD) (from the Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment software), with breast cancer, using the C statistic as the measure of model predictive ability. Model fit was compared via likelihood ratio tests. Results The study included 924 female patients (median age, 61 years [IQR: 51-69 years]), with 187 cases and 737 controls. Volumetric features from 3D reconstructed DBT scans had, on average, higher C statistics across all experimental conditions. Among models using only radiomic features, C statistics were highest for models using features from 3D images (mean C statistic: 0.68, P < .001); models using features from 2D image types resulted in lower mean C statistics (0.60 to 0.65). A baseline model using age, BMI, and area PD had a C statistic of 0.60. The effect of higher image resolution and smaller window size were not substantial, supporting the use of less computationally intensive processing. Conclusion Fully automated 3D parenchymal analysis from DBT improved breast cancer risk estimation beyond markers derived from area breast density and 2D images. Keywords: Mammography, Tomosynthesis, Breast, Volume Analysis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

Для цитирования: Nguyen Alex A, Cohen Eric A, Haji Maghsoudi Omid, Acciavatti Raymond J, Pantalone Lauren, Mankowski Walter C, Scott Christopher G, Winham Stacey, Vachon Celine M, Maidment Andrew D, Conant Emily F, McCarthy Anne Marie, Kontos Despina. Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study.. Radiology. Imaging cancer. 2025. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.240318.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.