Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2023
Time-Efficient, High-Resistance Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training Increases Exercise Tolerance in Midlife and Older Adults.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Craighead Daniel H, Freeberg Kaitlin A, Heinbockel Thomas C, Rossman Matthew J, Jackman Rachel A, McCarty Narissa P, Jankowski Lindsey R, Nemkov Travis, Reisz Julie A, D'Alessandro Angelo, Chonchol Michel, Bailey E Fiona, Seals Douglas R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if time-efficient, high-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST), comprising 30 inhalation-resisted breaths per day, improves cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, physical function, and/or regional body composition in healthy midlife and older adults.
METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial (NCT03266510) testing 6 wk of IMST (30 breaths per day, 6 d·wk -1 , 55%-75% maximal inspiratory pressure) versus low-resistance sham training (15% maximal inspiratory pressure) in healthy men and women 50-79 yr old. Subjects performed a graded treadmill exercise test to exhaustion, physical performance battery (e.g., handgrip strength, leg press), and body composition testing (dual x-ray absorptiometry) at baseline and after 6 wk of training.
RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (17 women, 18 men) completed high-resistance IMST ( n = 17) or sham training ( n = 18). Cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O 2peak ) was unchanged, but exercise tolerance, measured as treadmill exercise time during a graded exercise treadmill test, increased with IMST (baseline, 539 ± 42 s; end intervention, 606 ± 42 s; P = 0.01) but not sham training (baseline, 562 ± 39 s; end intervention, 553 ± 38 s; P = 0.69). IMST increased peak RER (baseline, 1.09 ± 0.02; end intervention, 1.13 ± 0.02; P = 0.012), peak ventilatory efficiency (baseline, 25.2 ± 0.8; end intervention, 24.6 ± 0.8; P = 0.036), and improved submaximal exercise economy (baseline, 23.5 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; end intervention, 22.1 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; P < 0.001); none of these factors were altered by sham training (all P > 0.05). Changes in plasma acylcarnitines (targeted metabolomics analysis) were consistently positively correlated with changes in exercise tolerance after IMST but not sham training. IMST was associated with regional increases in thorax lean mass (+4.4%, P = 0.06) and reductions in trunk fat mass (-4.8%, P = 0.04); however, peripheral muscle strength, muscle power, dexterity, and mobility were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that high-resistance IMST is an effective, time-efficient lifestyle intervention for improving exercise tolerance in healthy midlife and older adults.
METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial (NCT03266510) testing 6 wk of IMST (30 breaths per day, 6 d·wk -1 , 55%-75% maximal inspiratory pressure) versus low-resistance sham training (15% maximal inspiratory pressure) in healthy men and women 50-79 yr old. Subjects performed a graded treadmill exercise test to exhaustion, physical performance battery (e.g., handgrip strength, leg press), and body composition testing (dual x-ray absorptiometry) at baseline and after 6 wk of training.
RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (17 women, 18 men) completed high-resistance IMST ( n = 17) or sham training ( n = 18). Cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O 2peak ) was unchanged, but exercise tolerance, measured as treadmill exercise time during a graded exercise treadmill test, increased with IMST (baseline, 539 ± 42 s; end intervention, 606 ± 42 s; P = 0.01) but not sham training (baseline, 562 ± 39 s; end intervention, 553 ± 38 s; P = 0.69). IMST increased peak RER (baseline, 1.09 ± 0.02; end intervention, 1.13 ± 0.02; P = 0.012), peak ventilatory efficiency (baseline, 25.2 ± 0.8; end intervention, 24.6 ± 0.8; P = 0.036), and improved submaximal exercise economy (baseline, 23.5 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; end intervention, 22.1 ± 1.1 mL·kg -1 ⋅min -1 ; P < 0.001); none of these factors were altered by sham training (all P > 0.05). Changes in plasma acylcarnitines (targeted metabolomics analysis) were consistently positively correlated with changes in exercise tolerance after IMST but not sham training. IMST was associated with regional increases in thorax lean mass (+4.4%, P = 0.06) and reductions in trunk fat mass (-4.8%, P = 0.04); however, peripheral muscle strength, muscle power, dexterity, and mobility were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that high-resistance IMST is an effective, time-efficient lifestyle intervention for improving exercise tolerance in healthy midlife and older adults.