JBI evidence synthesis · 2024
Effects of nutritional counseling on physical performance and muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review protocol.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buckinx Fanny, Brabant Christian, Bruyère Olivier, Durieux Nancy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to synthesize the effects of nutritional counseling compared with no intervention (maintaining lifestyle habits) or nutritional counseling in combination with other interventions (eg, nutritional supplementation, physical activity) on physical performance and muscle strength in older adults.
INTRODUCTION: Nutritional counseling, which is considered the first line of nutrition therapy, could play an important role in geriatric care programs by helping older adults understand the importance of nutrition and by promoting healthy, sustainable eating habits. However, the effects of nutritional counseling on physical function and muscle strength among older adults are not clear.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials. Participants aged 65 years or older, who have received nutritional counseling alone or in combination with another intervention (eg, nutritional supplementation, physical exercise) will be considered for inclusion. Comparators will include another intervention or no intervention, but physical performance (ie, gait, endurance, balance) or muscle strength must be measured.
METHODS: This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CENTRAL (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will include Google Scholar and protocol registers. Two independent reviewers will select relevant studies, critically appraise the studies, and extract data. Studies will be pooled in a statistical meta-analysis or presented in narrative format. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence.
REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022374527.
INTRODUCTION: Nutritional counseling, which is considered the first line of nutrition therapy, could play an important role in geriatric care programs by helping older adults understand the importance of nutrition and by promoting healthy, sustainable eating habits. However, the effects of nutritional counseling on physical function and muscle strength among older adults are not clear.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials. Participants aged 65 years or older, who have received nutritional counseling alone or in combination with another intervention (eg, nutritional supplementation, physical exercise) will be considered for inclusion. Comparators will include another intervention or no intervention, but physical performance (ie, gait, endurance, balance) or muscle strength must be measured.
METHODS: This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CENTRAL (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will include Google Scholar and protocol registers. Two independent reviewers will select relevant studies, critically appraise the studies, and extract data. Studies will be pooled in a statistical meta-analysis or presented in narrative format. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence.
REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022374527.