Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2023
The Single Leg Bridge Test does not replace handheld dynamometer hamstring tests in a clinical setting.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robaina Bruno de Quadros, Medeiros Diulian Muniz, Roberti Lucas de Souza, Franke Rodrigo de Azevedo, Baroni Bruno Manfredini
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the correlation of Single Leg Bridge Test (SLBT) scores with maximum isometric strength values obtained in handheld dynamometer (HHD) hamstring tests performed in a clinical setting.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Physical therapy clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty healthy and physically active men.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between SLBT scores and force values found in three HHD hamstring tests: test 'A', volunteer in prone with hip in neutral position and the knee flexed at ∼90°; test 'B', volunteer in supine with hip and knee flexed at ∼90°; and test 'C', volunteer in the same position used to perform the SLBT.
RESULTS: The volunteers' SLBT score was 27.55 ± 7.81 repetitions. The SLBT scores were poorly associated with mean (r = 0.246) and peak (r = 0.321) results provided by HHD test 'A'. There were no significant correlations between the SLBT scores and mean or peak values obtained in tests 'B' and 'C' (p > 0.05). Similarly, the SLBT between-limb asymmetry was not associated with asymmetries found in HHD hamstring tests (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HHD hamstring tests should not be replaced by the SLBT. We recommend for clinicians to applying such tests in a complementary way to assess the hamstring's functional status.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Physical therapy clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty healthy and physically active men.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between SLBT scores and force values found in three HHD hamstring tests: test 'A', volunteer in prone with hip in neutral position and the knee flexed at ∼90°; test 'B', volunteer in supine with hip and knee flexed at ∼90°; and test 'C', volunteer in the same position used to perform the SLBT.
RESULTS: The volunteers' SLBT score was 27.55 ± 7.81 repetitions. The SLBT scores were poorly associated with mean (r = 0.246) and peak (r = 0.321) results provided by HHD test 'A'. There were no significant correlations between the SLBT scores and mean or peak values obtained in tests 'B' and 'C' (p > 0.05). Similarly, the SLBT between-limb asymmetry was not associated with asymmetries found in HHD hamstring tests (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HHD hamstring tests should not be replaced by the SLBT. We recommend for clinicians to applying such tests in a complementary way to assess the hamstring's functional status.