International journal of surgery case reports · 2017
Retroperitoneal paraganglioma-Is pre operative embolization useful?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Apentchenko Eriutina Natalia, Castellón Pavón Camilo J, García Vásquez Carlos, Gonzalo Montesinos Irene, Jiménez de Los Galanes Santos, Pacheco Martínez Pedro A, Gómez Patiño Juan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Paragangliomas (PG) are rare tumors derived from chromaffin cells that are located outside the adrenal gland and are capable of producing catecholamines. The treatment is based on a surgical resection, and there is controversy regarding the usefulness of previously carrying out an embolization and what is the most adequate surgical approach.
CLINICAL CASE: We will present a 17-year-old woman with a retroperitoneal tumour in contact with the aorta and the inferior vena cava, treated with embolization prior to the surgical resection via laparotomy.
DISCUSSION: The PG tumors are very infrequent and originate in the extra-adrenal chromaffin cells that exist in the vicinity of the components of the autonomic nervous system. Most of them (86%) produce catecholamines, are unique, sporadic, benign and more frequent in middle-aged women. Since they are radioresistant tumors, the only possibility for a cure is by a complete surgical excision. The preoperative embolization has been described mainly as the treatment of cervical PG, although its use in abdominal PG is more controversial and is not done in a systematic manner.
CONCLUSION: We can conclude that the embolization of abdominal PG is not free of risks and that it has not been demonstrated that it significantly reduces the peri-operative bleeding or the surgical time. Probably, the embolization should be reserved for intensively hypervascularized and larger PGs.
CLINICAL CASE: We will present a 17-year-old woman with a retroperitoneal tumour in contact with the aorta and the inferior vena cava, treated with embolization prior to the surgical resection via laparotomy.
DISCUSSION: The PG tumors are very infrequent and originate in the extra-adrenal chromaffin cells that exist in the vicinity of the components of the autonomic nervous system. Most of them (86%) produce catecholamines, are unique, sporadic, benign and more frequent in middle-aged women. Since they are radioresistant tumors, the only possibility for a cure is by a complete surgical excision. The preoperative embolization has been described mainly as the treatment of cervical PG, although its use in abdominal PG is more controversial and is not done in a systematic manner.
CONCLUSION: We can conclude that the embolization of abdominal PG is not free of risks and that it has not been demonstrated that it significantly reduces the peri-operative bleeding or the surgical time. Probably, the embolization should be reserved for intensively hypervascularized and larger PGs.