MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000447737

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in ophthalmology · 2016

Corneal Phaeohyphomycosis Caused by Bipolaris hawaiiensis.

Chaidaroon Winai, Supalaset Sumet, Tananuvat Napaporn, Vanittanakom Nongnuch

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of keratitis infected by Bipolaris hawaiiensis.

METHODS

A patient who was diagnosed as fungal keratitis caused by B. hawaiiensis was retrospectively reviewed for history, clinical characteristics, risk factors, laboratory findings, treatments, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A 63-year-old man with a history of trauma and saw dust in the left eye presented with a corneal ulcer. Eye examination revealed whitish infiltration with a feathery edge and small brownish deposits in the anterior stroma of the left cornea. Numerous septate hyphal fragments were detected in a corneal specimen, and nucleotide sequence analysis identified B. hawaiiensis. Treatment was started with 5% natamycin eyedrops and oral itraconazole. Subsequently, a corneal plaque developed which did not respond to medication and debridement. The patient underwent therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

B. hawaiiensis is a rare cause of corneal phaeohyphomycosis. A brownish pigmented infiltration is an important diagnostic clue, however microbiologic studies are required to obtain a definite diagnosis. Although antifungal medication and debridement are the mainstay of most corneal fungal infection, therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty can prevent morbidity related to this fungal infection.

Для цитирования: Chaidaroon Winai, Supalaset Sumet, Tananuvat Napaporn, Vanittanakom Nongnuch. Corneal Phaeohyphomycosis Caused by Bipolaris hawaiiensis.. Case reports in ophthalmology. 2016. DOI: 10.1159/000447737.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.