Impact of vitamin D replacement in patients with normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism and coexisting vitamin D deficiency.

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D deficiency is increasingly recognized in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism but some clinicians are reluctant to replace vitamin D due to concerns with aggravating hypercalcaemia. We investigated the impact of vitamin D repletion in asymptomatic patients with normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 111 patients with elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations (>6.4 pmol/L) referred to our endocrine clinic between January and December 2012; we identified 39 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency, i.e. 25 hydroxy vitamin D <20 µg/L. Patients were categorized into normocalcaemic (n = 23) and hypercalcaemic (n = 16) groups and the impact on biochemical parameters was recorded after at least six months treatment with either 1600 or 3200 units daily of cholecalciferol.

RESULTS

Both normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic groups showed a rise in 25 hydroxy vitamin D concentrations after replacement (p <0.0001). Parathyroid hormone concentrations fell in the normocalcaemic group (p = 0.08) but individually, five patients showed a rise (8-38% of baseline). In the hypercalcaemic group, parathyroid hormone remained static but the adjusted calcium concentration fell significantly (p = 0.006) except in two patients who showed mild rises (3 and 6%, respectively). There was no deterioration in renal function or calcium-related adverse events in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the safety of vitamin D replacement in patients with mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism and coexistent vitamin D deficiency. Repletion does not aggravate hypercalcaemia and may limit disease progression. Patients with normocalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism need further characterization from longitudinal studies.