MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.4.217

Медицинская библиотека · Korean journal of orthodontics · 2014

Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of a root-fractured maxillary central incisor: A 12-year follow-up case report.

Alessandri Bonetti Giulio, Incerti Parenti Serena, Ciocci Maurizio, Checchi Luigi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Single-tooth implantation has become a common treatment solution for replacement of a root-fractured maxillary incisor in adults, but the long-term esthetic results can be unfavorable due to progressive marginal bone loss, resulting in gingival recession. In this case report, a maxillary central incisor with a root fracture in its apical one-third was orthodontically extruded and extracted in a 21-year-old female. Implant surgery was performed after a 3-month healing period, and the final crown was placed about 12 months after extraction. After 12 years, favorable osseous and gingival architectures were visible with adequate bone height and thickness at the buccal cortical plate, and no gingival recession was seen around the implant-supported crown. Although modern dentistry has been shifting toward simplified, clinical procedures and shorter treatment times, both general dentists and orthodontists should be aware of the possible long-term esthetic advantages of orthodontic extrusion of hopelessly fractured teeth for highly esthetically demanding areas and should educate and motivate patients regarding the choice of this treatment solution, if necessary.

Для цитирования: Alessandri Bonetti Giulio, Incerti Parenti Serena, Ciocci Maurizio, Checchi Luigi. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of a root-fractured maxillary central incisor: A 12-year follow-up case report.. Korean journal of orthodontics. 2014. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.4.217.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.