DOI 10.1097/ana.0b013e3181eee55e
Intracranial hemorrhage surgery on patients on mechanical circulatory support: a case series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and late-stage heart failure is associated with a high level of morbidity and mortality. The ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenators are the mainstay of mechanical circulatory support devices for the patients with extremely low cardiac output. However, they come at a price of significant risk factors, including intracranial hemorrhage. The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage on extracorporeal membrane oxygenators and on ventricular assist devices is 37% and 13% to 14%, respectively.
METHODS/
RESULTS
The cases in this series focus on the risks of ICH and the decompressive craniotomies that were carried out on patients while they were on mechanical circulatory support. The intraoperative anesthetic management for patients on mechanical circulatory support for the noncardiothoracic anesthesiologist is highlighted.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of recent cardiothoracic surgery trials have led to an increase of surgical management instead of medical management in the treatment of heart failure. Although most agree with the immediate reversal of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, there is no standard protocol for restarting anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after craniotomy in this population. The standard practices of resuscitation and ACLS including inotropes, vasopressors, and vasodilators (with the exception of chest compressions that can dislodge the devices), can be used as needed. The identification of cardiothoracic surgeons and perfusionists who are available for immediate assistance as and when required during the surgery and transportation is an important factor.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.