The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2010
Audit of management of periorbital cellulitis and abscess in a district general hospital and a tertiary referral centre, in line with published guidelines.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dhillon Neeru, Jones N, Fergie N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To audit the management of periorbital cellulitis or abscess, in line with guidelines published in 2004, within a district general hospital and a tertiary referral centre.
METHOD: Retrospective audit analysing 58 cases at a district general hospital and 61 cases at a tertiary referral centre, encountered since 2004.
RESULTS: At the tertiary referral centre, 22 patients were diagnosed with pre-septal cellulitis and discharged, as were 20 cases at the district general hospital. At the tertiary referral centre, 95 per cent of patients were correctly seen by an ophthalmologist and 82 per cent by a senior ENT surgeon, compared with 63 and 39 per cent, respectively, at the district general hospital. In both centres, one patient did not receive a computed tomography scan where this was indicated. Despite the need for twice daily monitoring of ophthalmological criteria, both sites lacked 100 per cent compliance. At the tertiary referral centre, 76 per cent of patients were correctly treated with intravenous antibiotics, compared with 68 per cent at the district general hospital.
CONCLUSION: At both sites, adherence to guidelines was suboptimal. Management may be improved through improved education and online information support.
METHOD: Retrospective audit analysing 58 cases at a district general hospital and 61 cases at a tertiary referral centre, encountered since 2004.
RESULTS: At the tertiary referral centre, 22 patients were diagnosed with pre-septal cellulitis and discharged, as were 20 cases at the district general hospital. At the tertiary referral centre, 95 per cent of patients were correctly seen by an ophthalmologist and 82 per cent by a senior ENT surgeon, compared with 63 and 39 per cent, respectively, at the district general hospital. In both centres, one patient did not receive a computed tomography scan where this was indicated. Despite the need for twice daily monitoring of ophthalmological criteria, both sites lacked 100 per cent compliance. At the tertiary referral centre, 76 per cent of patients were correctly treated with intravenous antibiotics, compared with 68 per cent at the district general hospital.
CONCLUSION: At both sites, adherence to guidelines was suboptimal. Management may be improved through improved education and online information support.