MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000157

Медицинская библиотека · Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2022

A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.

Mayo Amanda L, Gould Sarah, Cimino Stephanie R, Glasford Shane, Harvey Evan, Ratto Matt, Hitzig Sander L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Digital residual limb shape capture (three-dimensional [3D] scanning), computer-assisted design (CAD), and computer-assisted manufacturing with 3D printing technology show promise for a completely digital process of fabricating prosthetic sockets for patients with limb loss. The effectiveness and quality of digitally designed 3D-printed lower extremity prosthetic sockets is understudied, and there is lack of data on the patient and prosthetist experiences with this digital workflow.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain stakeholder feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of using a completely digital prosthetic fabrication process consisting of 3D scanning, CAD, and 3D printing in a rehabilitation setting for adults with transtibial limb amputations.

STUDY

DESIGN

Qualitative design.

METHODS

Study participants with a transtibial-level amputation were fit with a prosthetic socket fabricated using digital shape capture with a 3D scanner, CAD, and 3D printing in addition to a traditionally handcasted manually fabricated socket. Participants tried on and evaluated both sockets. Semistructured interviews took place after the fitting appointments. A focus group was conducted with prosthetists to obtain their feedback. Audio data were transcribed verbatim, and an inductive content analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Eleven patient participants and 3 prosthetists identified 4 main themes: 1) openness and enthusiasm for digital prosthetic fabrication; 2) relative advantages of digital fabrication vs. traditional socket fabrication; 3) readiness of the technology used for adoption in practice; and 4) digital prosthetic workflow and 3D printing implementation considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and prosthetists were enthusiastic about digital prosthetic socket fabrication and saw potential advantages over traditional methods. Both patients and prosthetists had concerns about the durability, safety, and aesthetics of the 3D printed sockets in this study. Further studies are needed to optimize digital prosthetic fabrication with 3D printing in prosthetic practice.

Для цитирования: Mayo Amanda L, Gould Sarah, Cimino Stephanie R, Glasford Shane, Harvey Evan, Ratto Matt, Hitzig Sander L. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000157.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.