MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17549507.2014.979879

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of speech-language pathology · 2015

Problematic topic transitions in dysarthric conversation.

Bloch Steven, Saldert Charlotta, Ferm Ulrika

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study examined the nature of topic transition problems associated with acquired progressive dysarthric speech in the everyday conversation of people with motor neurone disease.

METHOD: Using conversation analytic methods, a video collection of five naturally occurring problematic topic transitions was identified, transcribed and analysed. These were extracted from a main collection of over 200 other-initiated repair sequences and a sub-set of 15 problematic topic transition sequences. The sequences were analysed with reference to how the participants both identified and resolved the problems.

RESULT: Analysis revealed that topic transition by people with dysarthria can prove problematic. Conversation partners may find transitions problematic not only because of speech intelligibility but also because of a sequential disjuncture between the dysarthric speech turn and whatever topic has come prior. In addition the treatment of problematic topic transition as a complaint reveals the potential vulnerability of people with dysarthria to judgements of competence.

CONCLUSION

These findings have implications for how dysarthria is conceptualized and how specific actions in conversation, such as topic transition, might be suitable targets for clinical intervention.

Для цитирования: Bloch Steven, Saldert Charlotta, Ferm Ulrika. Problematic topic transitions in dysarthric conversation.. International journal of speech-language pathology. 2015. DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2014.979879.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.