MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39098

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA network open · 2023

Hypertension Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control in India.

Varghese Jithin Sam, Venkateshmurthy Nikhil Srinivasapura, Sudharsanan Nikkil, Jeemon Panniyammakal, Patel Shivani A, Thirumurthy Harsha, Roy Ambuj, Tandon Nikhil, Narayan K M Venkat, Prabhakaran Dorairaj, Ali Mohammed K

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Hypertension is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Previous efforts to characterize gaps in the hypertension care continuum-including diagnosis, treatment, and control-in India did not assess district-level variation. Local data are critical for planning, implementation, and monitoring efforts to curb the burden of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the hypertension care continuum in India among individuals aged 18 to 98 years.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

The nationally representative Fifth National Family Health Survey study was conducted in 2 phases from June 17, 2019, to March 21, 2020, and from November 21, 2020, to April 30, 2021, among 1 895 297 individuals in 28 states, 8 union territories, and 707 districts of India.

EXPOSURES: District and state of residence, urban classification, age (18-39, 40-64, and ≥65 years), sex, and household wealth quintile.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hypertension was defined as a self-reported diagnosis or a newly measured blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or more. The proportion of individuals diagnosed (self-reported), the proportion of individuals treated among those diagnosed (self-reported medication use), and the proportion of individuals with blood pressure control among those treated (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg [aged 18-79 years] or <150/90 mm Hg [aged ≥80 years]) were calculated based on national guidelines. Age-standardized estimates of treatment and control were also provided among the total with hypertension. To assess differences in the care continuum between or within states (ie, between districts), the variance was partitioned using generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Of the 1 691 036 adult respondents (52.6% women; mean [SD] age, 41.6 [16.5] years), 28.1% (95% CI, 27.9%-28.3%) had hypertension, of whom 36.9% (95% CI, 36.4%-37.3%) received a diagnosis. Among those who received a diagnosis, 44.7% (95% CI, 44.1%-45.3%) reported taking medication (corresponding to 17.7% [95% CI, 17.5%-17.9%] of the total with hypertension). Among those treated, 52.5% (95% CI, 51.7%-53.4%) had blood pressure control (corresponding to 8.5% [95% CI, 8.3%-8.6%] of the total with hypertension). There were substantial variations across districts in blood pressure diagnosis (range, 6.3%-77.5%), treatment (range, 8.7%-97.1%), and control (range, 2.7%-76.6%). Large proportions of the variation in hypertension diagnosis (94.7%), treatment (93.6%), and control (97.3%) were within states, not just between states.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional survey study of Indian adults, more than 1 in 4 people had hypertension, and of these, only 1 in 3 received a diagnosis, less than 1 in 5 were treated, and only 1 in 12 had blood pressure control. National mean values hide considerable state-level and district-level variation in the care continuum, suggesting the need for targeted, decentralized solutions to improve the hypertension care continuum in India.

Для цитирования: Varghese Jithin Sam, Venkateshmurthy Nikhil Srinivasapura, Sudharsanan Nikkil, Jeemon Panniyammakal, Patel Shivani A, Thirumurthy Harsha, Roy Ambuj, Tandon Nikhil, Narayan K M Venkat, Prabhakaran Dorairaj, Ali Mohammed K. Hypertension Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control in India.. JAMA network open. 2023. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39098.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.