The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2022
Polyetheretherketone subperiosteal implant retaining a maxillary fixed prosthesis: A case series.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Sawy Mohammed A, ELgamal Mohamed E, Ahmed Wael M, El-Daker Medhat A, Hegazy Salah A
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Patients needing dental rehabilitation of a complete atrophic maxilla would benefit from simplified treatment plans.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to demonstrate the prosthetic management of 4 edentulous patients with severe maxillary ridge resorption who declined multiple stage surgery and sought a fixed prosthesis in single-stage surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients were provided with completely digital computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) maxillary subperiosteal frameworks, which were surgically placed in a 1-step procedure. The patients were followed up for 12 months and evaluated for signs of implant rejection, infection, prosthetic fracture or mobility, or implant exposure.
RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, all the implants were functionally stable with healthy soft tissue and showed no sign of prosthetic fracture, infection, or pus discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: PEEK subperiosteal implants for maxillary atrophied ridges can be considered a promising treatment option within the limitations of this clinical study with low patient numbers and a short observational time.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to demonstrate the prosthetic management of 4 edentulous patients with severe maxillary ridge resorption who declined multiple stage surgery and sought a fixed prosthesis in single-stage surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients were provided with completely digital computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) maxillary subperiosteal frameworks, which were surgically placed in a 1-step procedure. The patients were followed up for 12 months and evaluated for signs of implant rejection, infection, prosthetic fracture or mobility, or implant exposure.
RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, all the implants were functionally stable with healthy soft tissue and showed no sign of prosthetic fracture, infection, or pus discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: PEEK subperiosteal implants for maxillary atrophied ridges can be considered a promising treatment option within the limitations of this clinical study with low patient numbers and a short observational time.