MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.239

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2019

Postoperative Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a Neurologic Complication that Must Not Be Overlooked: A Literature Review.

Zhong Yu-Xin, Lu Guan-Feng, Chen Xiao-Lu, Cao Fei

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an uncommon, yet life-threatening postoperative neuropathic complication that is easily neglected, and hence, timely treatment is not provided in the clinics. This review aims to summarize the clinical features of postoperative GBS, and thus, improve the understanding of postoperative GBS.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on postoperative GBS and assessed the demographic information, clinical manifestation, operation, time of onset of postoperative GBS, and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 33 cases of postoperative GBS were included in this study. The average age of patients with postoperative GBS was 46.9 years, and there was a peak in occurrence of GBS between ages 50 and 70 years. Men seemed more likely to have postoperative GBS than did women, with a ratio of 2.67:1. Progressive muscular weakness, present in 31 of the cases, was the most common presentation. Patients with spinal surgery were at further increased risk for GBS, and 84.8% of the patients with GBS had a good prognosis after prompt treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is probably a potential risk factor for the occurrence of GBS. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are imperative to reduce mortality.

Для цитирования: Zhong Yu-Xin, Lu Guan-Feng, Chen Xiao-Lu, Cao Fei. Postoperative Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a Neurologic Complication that Must Not Be Overlooked: A Literature Review.. World neurosurgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.239.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.