MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm14124162

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2025

Radiological Insights into UIP Pattern: A Comparison Between IPF and Non-IPF Patients.

Palmucci Stefano, Adorna Miriam, Rapisarda Angelica, Libra Alessandro, Fischetti Sefora, Sambataro Gianluca, Mauro Letizia Antonella, David Emanuele, Foti Pietro Valerio, Mattina Claudia, Spatola Corrado, Vancheri Carlo, Basile Antonio

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

This study aims to distinguish radiological differences between primary idiopathic Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) and secondary UIP patterns

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with HRCT findings consistent with a UIP pattern. Final diagnoses were established via multidisciplinary discussion and classified as primary UIP/IPF or secondary UIP, following the 2022 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines. An expert thoracic radiologist (>10 years of experience), blinded to clinical data, reviewed the earliest available HRCT assessing key imaging features: honeycombing (micro-, macro- or exuberant), fibrosis distribution (symmetry, anterior-upper lobe sign, etc.), ground-glass opacities (GGO), dilatation of esophagus. Additionally, AI software AVIEW Build 1.1.46.28-win Coreline (©Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved). performed lung texture analysis, quantifying total lung volume and radiological patterns. Statistical analysis was performed to reveal results.

Results

Among 53 cases, 31 were classified as IPF and 22 as secondary UIP cases. The expert radiologist achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 82.9%, specificity of 889%, with a positive predictive value of 93.5%-in distinguishing between primary and secondary UIP. Primary UIP cases exhibited typical hallmark radiological features, including uniform honeycombing with cranio-caudal distribution (90.3%). Reticulations contributed significantly to the fibrotic texture, maintaining a consistent cranio-caudal gradient and axial symmetry (84.8%). Secondary UIP displayed more significant radiological heterogeneity, including patchy fibrosis with irregular GGO distribution (84.5% versus 53.33%); other findings-such as exuberant honeycombing, four corner sign and wedge-shaped fibrosis-were mainly observed in secondary pattern with respective percentages of 31.8%, 9% and 49%.

Conclusions

Experienced thoracic radiologists, leveraging hallmark imaging features, play a critical role in improving diagnostic accuracy between primary and secondary UIP patterns.

Для цитирования: Palmucci Stefano, Adorna Miriam, Rapisarda Angelica, Libra Alessandro, Fischetti Sefora, Sambataro Gianluca, Mauro Letizia Antonella, David Emanuele, Foti Pietro Valerio, Mattina Claudia, Spatola Corrado, Vancheri Carlo, Basile Antonio. Radiological Insights into UIP Pattern: A Comparison Between IPF and Non-IPF Patients.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14124162.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.