Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
Deep Learning Algorithm-Reconstructed Triple-Rule-Out CT: Image Quality and Performance in Evaluating Coronary Lumen Stenosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Du Yu, Chen Xingyan, Zhang Jinhua, Zhang Jing, Zhao Yanjie, Tang Youfa, Chen Suping, Chen Xiangxiang, Chen Lang, Wang Qiuxia, Li Zhen
Аннотация
To assess radiation burden and contrast medium load, image quality, and the performance of AI-reader and junior radiologists in evaluating coronary stenosis using 80-kVp triple-rule-out (TRO) CT with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), 159 patients scheduled for TRO were prospectively recruited and randomized into group A (n = 80; 80-kVp with DLIR) or group B (n = 79; 100-kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V [ASIR-V 60%]). Patients were stratified by BMI (< 25 kg/m2 or ≥ 25 kg/m2). Contrast injection rate and volume were tailored to body surface area and tube voltage. Image quality was evaluated for pulmonary, coronary, and thoracic-abdominal arteries, focusing on noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), edge rise slope (ERS), figure-of-merit (FOM), and subjective scoring. The collective diagnosis by two chief radiologists served as the consensus-based reference standard for evaluating AI-reader and junior radiologists' reading consistency on coronary stenosis. Group A showed significantly lower radiation dose (7.29 ± 1.59 mSv vs. 11.22 ± 3.12 mSv, P < 0.001) and contrast volume (51 ± 5 mL vs. 62 ± 7 mL, P < 0.001) compared to group B. Group A also demonstrated lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR, comparable or superior ERS, and higher FOM across nine artery sites. Subjective scores for sharpness, vascular contrast, small-branch visibility, and overall image quality were comparable or better in Group A. AI-reader and junior radiologists performed similarly in classifying coronary stenosis in both groups. Then, 80-kVp TRO-CT with DLIR reduced radiation by 35.1% and contrast by 18.8%, while maintaining excellent image quality and diagnostic performance across BMI groups, offering a superior dose-to-quality balance compared to conventional methods.