MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00005

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2002

Advances in airway management for outpatients.

Bailey Craig R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As outpatient anaesthesia increases in volume so does research, especially in ways to reduce morbidity from relatively minor complications such as sore throat and hoarseness, as well as aiming to reduce costs and length of hospital stay. The past year has produced many studies in which newer airway devices have been compared with the laryngeal mask airway and this review evaluates them all.

RECENT FINDINGS: The relatively recent introduction of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway shows promise when insertion of a gastric tube is preferred in patients breathing spontaneously, whilst the intubating laryngeal mask airway has demonstrated its usefulness in those situations where the patient prefers to be anaesthetized but intubation may be difficult following classic laryngoscopy. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway and combitube probably only have a place in emergency airway management rather than elective anaesthesia.

SUMMARY: Despite the introduction of new airway devices, some of which have specific indications for use, the classic laryngeal mask airway remains the 'gold standard' with which newer devices are compared. Whilst some of these new devices show promise in the outpatient setting, further research is required before their universal acceptance.

Для цитирования: Bailey Craig R. Advances in airway management for outpatients.. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2002. DOI: 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.