Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2005
Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas as determined by the VITEK 2 and E test systems in a Kuwait teaching hospital.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jamal Wafaa, Rotimi V O, Khodakhast Fatima, Saleem Rolla, Pazhoor Aleyamma, Al Hashim Ghyada
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing members of the Enterobacteriaceae using VITEK 2 and E test systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,592 consecutive gram-negative isolates (single isolate per patient) of the family of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas adjudged to be clinically relevant to the patient's infection were studied for ESBL production over a period of 1 year at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait. Two methods were used: the automated VITEK 2 system and E test ESBL, a manually manipulated plastic strip containing various gradients of beta-lactam antibiotics. These tests and interpretative criteria for the results were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
RESULTS: Of the 3,592 bacterial isolates, 264 (7.5%) and 185 (5.2%) were positive for ESBL production by the VITEK 2 and E test, respectively. All the ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified by VITEK 2 gave indeterminate results by E test. Prevalent ESBL producers, identified by the VITEK 2 versus E test, respectively, were: Citrobacter spp. (15 vs. 3.2%), K. pneumoniae (12.2 vs. 11.4%), Enterobacter spp. (12 vs. 3%), E. coli (6.5 vs. 5.6%), P. aeruginosa (6.5 vs. 0%) and Morganella spp. (2 vs. 1%). The most common infection associated with ESBL-producing pathogens was urinary tract infection (68.2%), followed by wound infection (14.4%) and bloodstream infection (6.1%).
CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed a relatively high prevalence of clinically significant ESBL producers among the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. at our teaching hospital. The VITEK 2 identified a higher prevalence of ESBL strains than the E test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,592 consecutive gram-negative isolates (single isolate per patient) of the family of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas adjudged to be clinically relevant to the patient's infection were studied for ESBL production over a period of 1 year at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait. Two methods were used: the automated VITEK 2 system and E test ESBL, a manually manipulated plastic strip containing various gradients of beta-lactam antibiotics. These tests and interpretative criteria for the results were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
RESULTS: Of the 3,592 bacterial isolates, 264 (7.5%) and 185 (5.2%) were positive for ESBL production by the VITEK 2 and E test, respectively. All the ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified by VITEK 2 gave indeterminate results by E test. Prevalent ESBL producers, identified by the VITEK 2 versus E test, respectively, were: Citrobacter spp. (15 vs. 3.2%), K. pneumoniae (12.2 vs. 11.4%), Enterobacter spp. (12 vs. 3%), E. coli (6.5 vs. 5.6%), P. aeruginosa (6.5 vs. 0%) and Morganella spp. (2 vs. 1%). The most common infection associated with ESBL-producing pathogens was urinary tract infection (68.2%), followed by wound infection (14.4%) and bloodstream infection (6.1%).
CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed a relatively high prevalence of clinically significant ESBL producers among the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. at our teaching hospital. The VITEK 2 identified a higher prevalence of ESBL strains than the E test.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Anti-Bacterial AgentsAutoanalysisBacteriological TechniquesClavulanic AcidCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHospitals, TeachingHumansKuwaitPrevalencePseudomonasPseudomonas InfectionsStenotrophomonasbeta-Lactamases