MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000545965

Медицинская библиотека · Liver cancer · 2025

Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Yoon Jeong Hee, Chang Won, Kim Young Kon, Lee Chang Hee, Kim Jeong Woo, Park Beom Jin, Choi Jin-Young, Kim Seung-Seob, Park Hee Sun, Lee Eun Sun, Yu Jeong-Sik, Park Seong Jin, You Myung-Won, Jang Myoung-Jin, Choi Joon-Il, Lee Jeong Min

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to outperform computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although inconsistencies exist across studies. We compared the performance of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in diagnosing HCC according to various guidelines, and to assess the incremental value of a second-line examination.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients at risk of developing HCC with focal liver lesions (FLLs) ≥10 mm. These patients underwent both contrast-enhanced CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between January 2015 and June 2018. Four radiologists independently assessed the images using criteria from the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) guidelines. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI was compared across guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 1,590 FLLs (median size, 22.6 mm) were analyzed in 1,455 patients (median age, 59 years; male, 1,101). Sensitivity was higher with MRI than with CT for APASL (89.3% [95% CI: 87.7%, 90.8%] vs. 78.9% [95% CI: 77.0%, 80.8%], respectively) and KLCA-NCC (78.7% [95% CI: 76.7%, 85.0%] vs. 73.7% [95% CI: 71.6%, 75.7%], respectively) (p = 0.002 for both). However, LI-RADS showed lower sensitivity with MRI than with CT (70.6% [95% CI: 68.4%, 72.6%] vs. 74.7% [95% CI: 72.6%, 76.7%], p = 0.002), due to fewer nonperipheral washout. MRI re-categorized 22.4%, 32.2%, and 53.5% of non-HCC observations on CT as HCC with LI-RADS, KLCA-NCC, and APASL, respectively. CT re-classified 30.2%, 29.0%, and 25.8% of non-HCC observations on MRI as HCC with LI-RADS, KLCA-NCC, and APASL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI after CT depends on the diagnostic criteria used. Restricting washout timing to the portal venous phase in LI-RADS reduces the sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI relative to CT.

Для цитирования: Yoon Jeong Hee, Chang Won, Kim Young Kon, Lee Chang Hee, Kim Jeong Woo, Park Beom Jin, Choi Jin-Young, Kim Seung-Seob, Park Hee Sun, Lee Eun Sun, Yu Jeong-Sik, Park Seong Jin, You Myung-Won, Jang Myoung-Jin, Choi Joon-Il, Lee Jeong Min. Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Liver cancer. 2025. DOI: 10.1159/000545965.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.