Actas urologicas espanolas · 2015
Unplanned flexible ureteroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bernardo N, Lopez-Silva M, Sanguinetti H, Cabral C, Aguilar J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Over time, the prone position has been shown to be effective and safe for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One of its disadvantages, however, is the inability to simultaneously perform an ureteroscopy after positioning the patient, which is feasible in the supine position. Our objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing flexible ureteroscopy with the patient in the prone position.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of percutaneous nephrolithotomy of partial staghorn calculi in the prone position during which access to the middle calyx was not possible. It was therefore necessary to conduct flexible ureteroscopy. The 64-year-old female patient had consulted for lumbar pain of 6 months of evolution.
RESULTS: We performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position. After extracting calculi from the inner calyx and renal pelvis, access to the fragments located in the middle calyx could not be achieved. Rather than performing a new puncture, we decided to enter in a retrograde manner with a flexible ureteroscope, succeeding in extracting the residual calculi, leaving the patient completely free of calculi.
CONCLUSION: In our case, the implementation of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy was feasible without changing the patient's original position.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of percutaneous nephrolithotomy of partial staghorn calculi in the prone position during which access to the middle calyx was not possible. It was therefore necessary to conduct flexible ureteroscopy. The 64-year-old female patient had consulted for lumbar pain of 6 months of evolution.
RESULTS: We performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position. After extracting calculi from the inner calyx and renal pelvis, access to the fragments located in the middle calyx could not be achieved. Rather than performing a new puncture, we decided to enter in a retrograde manner with a flexible ureteroscope, succeeding in extracting the residual calculi, leaving the patient completely free of calculi.
CONCLUSION: In our case, the implementation of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy was feasible without changing the patient's original position.