MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12902-019-0422-z

Медицинская библиотека · BMC endocrine disorders · 2019

An atypical and bilateral presentation of Charcot foot disease.

Loupa C V, Meimeti E, Kokas A, Voyatzoglou E D, Donou A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy (CNO) is one of the most devastating complications of neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Establishing diagnosis of CNO is difficult, due to the lack of clear clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria. Diagnosis is even more difficult when there is atypical and bilateral clinical presentation. Since CNO may lead to foot deformity, lower-extremity amputation and significant decrements in quality of life, it must be detected and treated without delay. Treatment focuses mainly on interruption of the inflammatory process and relief from pain using feet offloading devices. In more severe cases, surgical intervention may be needed. Additionally, the use of custom-made insoles and custom-made orthopaedic shoes is mandatory.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a young diabetic patient who presented to our clinic with bilateral and atypical presentation of Charcot foot disease. Patient was treated successfully upon diagnosis with bilateral aircast offloading. Unfortunately, due to depression and non-compliance, the disease progressed to severe and permanent lesions later on.

CONCLUSION

Despite the rareness of this disease, clinicians must include CNO into differential diagnosis of diabetic foot oedema, inflammation and deformity.

Для цитирования: Loupa C V, Meimeti E, Kokas A, Voyatzoglou E D, Donou A. An atypical and bilateral presentation of Charcot foot disease.. BMC endocrine disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-019-0422-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.