MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2174/1573399815666190531093238

Медицинская библиотека · Current diabetes reviews · 2020

Clinical Utility of the Ankle-Brachial Index and Toe Brachial Index in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Ababneh Mutasem, Al Ayed Mousab Y, Robert Asirvatham A, Al Dawish Mohamed A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This cross sectional study investigated the clinical use of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and toe brachial index (TBI) in 91 type 2 diabetic foot ulcer patients who visited the diabetic foot clinic, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Saudi Arabia during July 2017 and January 2018.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The ABI and TBI facilitated the detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and the patients' medical records were used to collect the clinical and demographic variables. The variables of duration (p = 0.047) and treatment (p = 0.046) of the ABI showed significant differences. Age (p = 0.034) and duration (p = 0.001) were the factors related to the diagnosis of TBI by the "χ2" test.

RESULTS

From the TBI, 26.4% of the patients were found to have PAD, while the ABI showed that 21.8% of patients had the condition. However, no statistical significance was noted. From the regression analysis, the variable duration of diabetes (≥ 20 years of age) was recognized as an independent risk factor for TBI.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it is recommended both the ABI and TBI to be used as screening tests for PAD in diabetic foot ulcer patients.

Для цитирования: Ababneh Mutasem, Al Ayed Mousab Y, Robert Asirvatham A, Al Dawish Mohamed A. Clinical Utility of the Ankle-Brachial Index and Toe Brachial Index in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.. Current diabetes reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.2174/1573399815666190531093238.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.