MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00704

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychology · 2014

Well-being in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot experience sampling study.

Real Ruben G L, Dickhaus Thorsten, Ludolph Albert, Hautzinger Martin, Kübler Andrea

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this longitudinal study was to identify predictors of instantaneous well-being in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on flow theory well-being was expected to be highest when perceived demands and perceived control were in balance, and that thinking about the past would be a risk factor for rumination which would in turn reduce well-being.

METHODS

Using the experience sampling method, data on current activities, associated aspects of perceived demands, control, and well-being were collected from 10 patients with ALS three times a day for two weeks.

RESULTS

RESULTS show that perceived control was uniformly and positively associated with well-being, but that demands were only positively associated with well-being when they were perceived as controllable. Mediation analysis confirmed thinking about the past, but not thinking about the future, to be a risk factor for rumination and reduced well-being.

DISCUSSION: Findings extend our knowledge of factors contributing to well-being in ALS as not only perceived control but also perceived demands can contribute to well-being. They further show that a focus on present experiences might contribute to increased well-being.

Для цитирования: Real Ruben G L, Dickhaus Thorsten, Ludolph Albert, Hautzinger Martin, Kübler Andrea. Well-being in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot experience sampling study.. Frontiers in psychology. 2014. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00704.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.