[Risk Factors for Early Progression of Carotid Stenosis after Cervical Radiation Therapy].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Carotid stenosis may occur as a late complication following cervical radiation therapy(RT);however, it may also progress in the early post-RT period. This study aimed to characterize the clinical features associated with the early progression of post-RT carotid stenosis.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 30 patients who had undergone unilateral or bilateral cervical RT between January 2010 and November 2014. We analyzed the pre- and post-RT stenosis of their carotid arteries using contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. The arteries were classified as progressive or non-progressive according to the presence or absence of stenosis progression within five years after RT. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we evaluated the following potential clinical risk factors:age;gender;history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, or smoking habit;antiplatelet or statin use;radiation dose;and prior presence of carotid stenosis before RT.
RESULTS
In total, we reviewed 57 irradiated carotid arteries and identified 9 with early post-RT progression. Carotid stenosis before RT was observed in 88.9% of arteries in the progressive group but only 2% of arteries in the non-progressive group and it predicted progression(univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses, p<0.0001). No other clinical characteristics had a significant association with the progression of carotid stenosis.
CONCLUSION
Prior presence of carotid stenosis may be a risk factor for its early progression after RT. Pre-RT screening of cervical arteries may be useful, and strict management of carotid stenosis is critical in patients with cervical radiation therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.