MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/frtra.2024.1496702

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in transplantation · 2025

Case Report: Management of recurrent UTI with tigecycline in a kidney transplant recipient.

Shettar Supreeta R, Sumana Mahadevaiah Neelambike, Shetty Manjunath S, Maheshwarappa Yogeesh D, Reddy Raghukanth G, Srinivasan Asha, P Vamshi Dharan, Kalyatanda Gautam, S C Shruthi Shree

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This case report describes a 37-year-old man who underwent renal transplantation and subsequently developed complicated recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae. Despite initial treatment with fosfomycin and meropenem, the patient experienced persistent UTIs, leading to multiple hospitalizations. The management of these recurrent infections eventually required the use of tigecycline. Although tigecycline is not typically considered a urinary antibiotic owing to its limited urinary excretion, it was successfully employed in this case to manage the recurrent infections. The patient was treated with tigecycline for several episodes of UTI, which provided a crucial therapeutic option in the context of antibiotic resistance. This case underscores the challenges of managing recurrent MDR UTIs in immunocompromised patients and highlights tigecycline as an effective treatment strategy when standard therapies fail.

Для цитирования: Shettar Supreeta R, Sumana Mahadevaiah Neelambike, Shetty Manjunath S, Maheshwarappa Yogeesh D, Reddy Raghukanth G, Srinivasan Asha, P Vamshi Dharan, Kalyatanda Gautam, S C Shruthi Shree. Case Report: Management of recurrent UTI with tigecycline in a kidney transplant recipient.. Frontiers in transplantation. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1496702.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.